Signal Jammer Tech

Georgia Attorney General files FOIA request with FCC to ban cell phone jammers

The Attorney General of Georgia has submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to a federal agency concerning the prohibition of cell phone jammers in prisons located in Georgia.

This week, the office of Attorney General Chris Carr announced that Carr has submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This action follows the agency's ongoing refusal to permit state and local law enforcement to disrupt the signals of contraband cellphones within correctional facilities. Carr's request specifically seeks all inter-agency communications pertaining to his letter dated June 4, 2024, in which he advocated for the use of cell phone jamming technology in prisons and jails. Additionally, he is requesting all documents related to the FCC's denial of the State's request, as well as information concerning the deployment of cell phone jamming devices in certain federal prisons.

Carr stated in a press release, "Law enforcement faces significant challenges in addressing the issue of contraband cellphones, primarily due to an antiquated policy that the federal government is unwilling to revise or reconsider. The remedy is straightforward: by obstructing the signals of these illicit devices, we can curtail the violent crimes orchestrated from within correctional facilities and improve public safety initiatives. If the Biden administration is not prepared to collaborate with us, they should step aside and permit our officers to perform their duties efficiently."

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) presently forbids the utilization of cell phone "blockers," a restriction that also applies to state and local authorities. However, within correctional facilities across the nation, illicit cell phones are employed to strategize and execute violent assaults and various criminal endeavors, thereby presenting a significant threat to correctional staff, visitors, inmates, and the general public.

A leader of the notorious street gang known as the "Yves Saint Laurent Squad," currently serving time in prison, utilized an illegal cell phone to orchestrate a hit that led to the murder of an 88-year-old veteran from Georgia. In North Carolina, a gang leader directed the abduction of a prosecutor's father through the use of a contraband cell phone while incarcerated. Additionally, in California, prison gangs have exploited illegal cell phones to facilitate drug trafficking and to arrange murders within the correctional facilities.

In his letter dated June 2024, Carr observes that the Federal Communications Commission's existing policy is based on a statute that has been in place for many years. He adds, “The wording of 47 U.S.C § 333 does not prevent the FCC from changing its stance to permit state agencies to utilize cell phone jamming devices within correctional facilities. Moreover, the United States Bureau of Prisons has acknowledged the possible benefits of cell phone jammers and is authorized to deploy such devices in multiple federal prisons, including at least one located in Georgia.”

In January 2023, Carr, along with 21 other attorneys general, called upon Congressional leaders to enact legislation permitting states to establish a cell phone jamming system within correctional facilities.

The Carr’s Gang Prosecution Unit has collaborated with the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) to conduct investigations and prosecutions of individuals currently incarcerated who are suspected of participating in criminal gang activities, as well as discussions related to the packaging and transportation of contraband items into a GDC facility.

Thieves allegedly used signal jammer to fool San Jose man's Nest security camera

SAN JOSE, Calif. (KGO) -- This enigma unfolds in a manner reminiscent of numerous others, occurring during the late hours of the night.

The story commenced on the front porch of Jim Grubb's residence in San Jose, where the barking of his dog roused him from sleep.

He states that they awoke, descended the stairs, discovered the front door slightly open, and remarked to themselves, "It appears we must have left the door ajar last night."

The following morning, new evidence emerged. Grubb discovered that several items were missing, including a laptop and a drone.

He stated, "I accessed the Nest video camera positioned at our front door. The intruder was present in the front yard; the footage revealed a flashlight, and at times, his beanie cap was visible."

He continues by stating, "...and as I observe the video, I begin to notice these gaps within it, and I find that there are numerous gaps present."

There are portions of the video where we could potentially discern the thief's face.

Jim reached out to Nest customer support and was informed that the video doorbell had been communicating with the router without any interference prior to the incident.

He expressed his disbelief, stating, "I was astonished by this revelation. Consequently, I began conducting some research and discovered that it is possible to purchase a small microcontroller. This device can effectively de-authorize clients connected to your Wi-Fi network, thereby creating interference."

The items are priced at $7 each. For a total of $50, Grubb discovered a wrist model that provides enhanced precision in control. Although Grubb lacks concrete evidence, he is concerned that thieves might be interfering with Wi-Fi signals.

Google has expressed uncertainty regarding the situation, stating to 7 On Your Side: "Google Nest is dedicated to ensuring the privacy and security of our customers. We are currently aware of an isolated issue with the Nest Hello Doorbell, and our team is thoroughly investigating... there is no indication that the device was intentionally compromised."

Tristan Perry, a technology blogger hailing from Wales, has been examining this matter for some time and asserts that it is not particularly surprising.

It is widely recognized that Wi-Fi can encounter various problems, such as difficulties with mobile devices, interruptions during Zoom calls, or pauses in Netflix streaming, as stated in an interview with 7 On Your Side.

Recent sightings of unidentified drones in New Jersey and New York have been downplayed by the White House, with national security officials stating that there is "no evidence at this time indicating that these sightings threaten national security or public safety, nor do they suggest any foreign involvement." However, key lawmakers in the House and Senate are seeking further explanations.

In recent weeks, community members have been observing and capturing footage of drones that officials describe as commercial-grade, distinguishing them from ordinary "hobby" drones. Reports from witnesses and confirmations from officials suggest that these drones can reach diameters of up to 6 feet. This week, Republican Representative Jeff Van Drew from New Jersey heightened public anxiety by claiming on Fox News that the drones were launched from an Iranian "mothership" situated off the East Coast. The Department of Defense has dismissed this allegation.

Mike Johnson, the House Speaker, expressed his expectation of obtaining a classified briefing on the drones shortly. Senators Cory Booker and Andy King from New Jersey, as well as Senators Chuck Schumer and Kristen Gillibrand from New York, all of whom are Democrats, have sent letters to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Federal Aviation Administration Administrator Michael Whitaker, requesting updates through briefings.

Josh Gottheimer, a Congressman from New Jersey and a member of the Intelligence Committee, indicated that he was briefed on the drone situation in the past week. He remarked, "I do not perceive any immediate danger to public safety. Nevertheless, it is essential for the public to be better informed."

A variety of videos have achieved viral status, attracting tens of thousands of views on social media, leading to heightened concerns. The situation intensified on Wednesday when Representative Jeff Van Drew appeared on Fox News and claimed that the drones were launched from an Iranian "mothership" situated off the "East Coast of the United States."

He called for the drones to be "shot down."

Specific devices are used to interfere with drone signals (called drone jammers), but these devices are usually only used by security forces.

Large, mysterious drones reported in recent weeks flying over parts of New Jersey appear to evade detection by traditional methods such as helicopters and radios, according to a Department of Homeland Security briefing to state lawmakers on Wednesday.

In a post on the social media platform X, Assemblywoman Dawn Fantasia described the drones as up to 6 feet in diameter and sometimes flying with their lights off. The Republican congresswoman from Morris County is one of several state and local lawmakers who have met with state police and Department of Homeland Security officials to discuss a series of sightings from the New York City area to New Jersey and west to parts of Pennsylvania, including Philadelphia.

The devices do not appear to be flown by amateurs, Fantasia wrote.

Many residents in the tri-state area may be wondering what remedies they can take.

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy said an investigation into last month's drone sightings is underway. He briefed DHS chief Alejandro Mayorkas by phone on Wednesday.

Authorities say they are seeking information about drone sightings and are asking witnesses to call the FBI hotline at 1-800-225-5324 or leave a tip on the agency's website.

New Jersey state of emergency: Can you shoot down a drone?

As vigilance grows over unidentified swarms of drones -- many of which are reportedly larger than what hobbyists would acquire -- residents have been asking if they can be shot down.

The question is coming up more and more frequently as the use of drones for commercial and recreational purposes has surged. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, as of Oct. 1, there were 791,597 registered drones in the U.S. Of course, there may be others that aren't registered.

So, can you shoot a hovering drone with a gun or other projectile? The answer is no.

The FAA says it's illegal to shoot any aircraft, including drones.

A retired New Jersey fire captain recently faced criminal charges for shooting a drone that was hovering over his Florida home with a 9mm pistol. He believed the drone was spying on him. This is a Walmart delivery drone.

Shooting down a drone isn't the only way to disable it. Other methods include setting up nets and jamming drone signals.

How to stop drones from flying over your property?

Even if a drone flies over your property, the Federal Aviation Administration says homeowners can't control that airspace.

You can contact a professional drone removal service that can use nets and other drone jamming gun equipment to block a drone without damaging it, but it's expensive. You can file a complaint with the FAA online. Or you can report the drone to the police.

In the modern world, characterized by pervasive connectivity, signal jammers are crucial for the management and regulation of wireless communications. Their fundamental function is to create a designated zone where particular frequencies are disabled, effectively hindering communication through those specific channels.

The applications of signal blockers are extensive and span multiple domains. In high-security locations, including government offices, military installations, and prisons, these robust jammers play a crucial role in safeguarding operations by inhibiting unauthorized communications and thwarting the remote triggering of explosives. Furthermore, cell phone signal jammers are utilized in settings like theaters, meeting spaces, and testing environments to facilitate uninterrupted attention and maintain fairness by blocking cellular signals.

Furthermore, in academic settings, the implementation of GSM signal jammers can effectively deter students from accessing their mobile phones during lessons, thereby promoting a distraction-free educational atmosphere. In the realm of business, WiFi jammers are utilized to prevent electronic eavesdropping and to protect confidential information from being transmitted through unapproved channels.

Although the deployment of RF blockers and GPS jammers is constrained because of their capacity to interfere with emergency communication systems and SOS signals, their careful application has shown to be advantageous in bolstering security, privacy, and productivity in various contexts. By selectively obstructing certain radio frequencies, frequency jammers act as a tactical resource for managing wireless communications effectively.

Here are the main reasons why you might want to buy a signal jammer:

• In order to prevent unauthorized listening to your cell phone conversations, it is imperative to utilize a communication jammer. This technology serves to block intrusive signals, ensuring that your conversations remain private.


• Defend against intrusive devices: Take measures to protect yourself from GSM bugs and other eavesdropping technologies. Jammers will effectively eliminate these threats, ensuring your privacy remains secure.


• In the event that you believe a GPS tracker has been placed on your automobile, employing a GPS jammers can obstruct satellite communications, effectively preventing others from tracking your location.


• Designate a silent zone: Within a meeting room, office, or any setting that demands undisturbed concentration, the use of a jammer can facilitate the creation of a "quiet zone," effectively blocking interference from mobile phones and various devices.


• Absolute security: Shield yourself from clandestine data collection via every available channel. Versatile jammers can effectively manage a range of signal types to ensure your complete confidentiality.

In instances where there is a suspicion of eavesdropping through a GSM bug, employing a GSM cell phone jammer will render all listening devices and smartphones in the vicinity inoperative. Furthermore, this device serves to eliminate bothersome cell phone calls during meetings or other times when interruptions are unwelcome.

Should you be apprehensive about the presence of hidden cameras observing you, the implementation of wireless camera blockers and radio signal suppressors will prevent the transmission of camera signals over radio or WiFi, thus protecting your privacy.

These examples highlight several prevalent scenarios in which our devices are particularly advantageous. Understanding which frequencies need to be disrupted is essential. If there is any doubt, it may be wise to consider a multi-range jammer, such as those designed for cell/GPS or cell/Wi-Fi signals, which can manage multiple types of signals. Furthermore, the range of signal suppressors can vary significantly. For limited spaces, like a car or a small room, a small and economical jammer is ideal. In contrast, larger areas may require a more powerful, possibly stationary jammer to ensure effective signal blocking.

By selecting the correct jammer, you can ensure the protection of your privacy while preserving control over your personal and professional domains.

Envision this situation: You are ready to indulge in a delectable meal at your beloved restaurant when a cell phone rings loudly from the neighboring table, breaking the serene atmosphere. The person involved not only responds to the call but also carries on with a loud and inconsequential dialogue.

Such disruptions severely impact the dining experience for everyone involved. Patrons not only forfeit the pleasure of their meal but also become frustrated and distracted by the inconsiderate behavior of others. Whether it is the sound of ringing phones or loud conversations, mobile devices are a significant source of irritation in communal spaces. This disturbance not only affects other diners but also disrupts the serene environment that restaurants endeavor to uphold.

Why People Are Switching to Feature Phones

An increasing trend among Americans is the shift from smartphones to simpler mobile devices, known as "dumb phones," which are designed solely for voice calls and text messaging. This change is motivated by a desire to escape the distractions linked to "zombie mode." The market for dumb phones is expanding, with sales reaching 2.8 million in the U.S. during the previous year. Individuals who have adopted these phones express feelings of tranquility and improved concentration on their daily lives.

A notable shift is occurring as more people choose feature phones to escape the incessant stream of notifications and the allure of constant social media engagement. These uncomplicated devices facilitate greater awareness of one's surroundings and enhance personal interactions. In the past year, feature phone sales in the U.S. reached 2.8 million units, reflecting a burgeoning appetite for technology that is less complex and distracting.

Individuals who utilize feature phones often experience greater mental clarity, superior sleep, and more fulfilling relationships. The lack of persistent distractions enables them to focus their time and energy on genuine interactions and activities in the real world.

Cell Phone Jammers in Restaurants

A number of restaurants have chosen to install cell phone jammers, receiving positive feedback from customers who enjoy the calmer and more intimate setting. By preventing mobile signals, these restaurants are able to cultivate a quieter environment that allows diners to engage with their food and each other without interruptions from phone calls and loud chatter. Many patrons report enhanced satisfaction and a more enjoyable dining experience in locations that employ signal jammers to ensure a serene atmosphere.

The issue of cargo theft is a pressing concern for logistics companies operating within Mexico. Various methods are employed by criminals to execute these thefts, including hijacking, robbery, and burglary. In recent times, a notably sophisticated approach has gained prominence: the deployment of signal jammers. These jammers disrupt GPS and mobile phone communications, hindering authorities' ability to trace stolen cargo effectively.

Despite the rising concern surrounding frequency jamming devices, numerous approaches exist to avert their detrimental effects on your business. This overview will elucidate the mechanics of cell phone jammer, the factors contributing to their widespread use, and the actions you can take to protect your supply chain from interference.

How signal jammers function

Electronic devices known as signal jammers generate radio signals that interfere with various communication systems, such as GPS, cellular networks, Wi-Fi, and RFID tags. Criminals frequently utilize these wifi jammer to hinder the signals from tracking devices installed in cargo trucks, which poses significant challenges for authorities attempting to determine the actual whereabouts of shipments.

Cargo theft facilitated by jammers can occur with any type of shipment, ranging from high-value loads to minor deliveries. Electronics, pharmaceuticals, and automotive parts are especially sought after, as these items can be rebranded and sold on the black market. This issue not only disrupts supply chains but also affects consumers, as stolen shipments can lead to increased prices and reduced availability of critical goods.

The issue of jammers in cargo theft has escalated into a serious concern in Mexico in recent years. Data indicates that from January to June 2024, 64% of theft occurrences involved the use of signal jamming technology. Although these devices are illegal, their utilization is on the rise among organized crime groups. In response, the Mexican government is taking action to strengthen the legal framework against their use and impose stricter penalties.

The Mexican government’s fight against signal jammers

To address the issue of signal blockers, the Mexican government has enacted measures to regulate these devices. The Anti-Jammer Law, effective January 25, 2020, was introduced with the support of the National Association of Vehicle Tracking and Protection Companies (ANERPV). Under this law, authorities are authorized to impose penalties of 12 to 15 years in prison on individuals involved in the manufacturing, marketing, or usage of jammers, as well as those who make them available for use.

The enactment of the Anti-Jammer Law marks a vital progress in the enhancement of cargo security in Mexico. However, relying solely on legislative measures is inadequate to effectively counter this threat. It is essential for logistics companies to adopt proactive strategies to ensure the safety of their cargo, such as employing multiple tracking devices, investing in robust physical security, and maintaining vigilant monitoring of their shipments for any irregularities.

Managing security is undoubtedly a complex endeavor, and unprepared supply chains are often susceptible to criminal exploitation. Fortunately, collaborating with Overhaul provides you with the necessary resources to effectively combat signal jammers, improve your readiness against cargo theft, and tackle additional security issues.

The rise of high-tech burglary techniques poses a significant challenge to conventional security measures, including cameras and alarm systems. Thieves have begun to employ strategies that interfere with Wi-Fi signals, thereby undermining the effectiveness of these protective devices. Police recommend that residents adopt various precautions to mitigate the risk of theft.

The majority of modern households utilize Wi-Fi signals to support their security system burglar alarms and surveillance tools, which encompass doorbell cameras.

Police advise residents to replace their Wi-Fi surveillance systems with wired connections. They recommend reaching out to network providers or electricians to facilitate the connection of the burglar alarm system to the router using cables. This strategy negates the need for Wi-Fi, thus preventing the interference of Wi-Fi jammers.

The FCC emphasizes to consumers that should they encounter any interruptions in their home Wi-Fi, they should immediately get in touch with their internet provider. This will help ascertain whether the problem is due to a malfunctioning device or if it is being compromised by a signal jammers.

VERMILIAN PARISH, La. ( KLFY ) — Authorities are asking for the public’s help in identifying a man who posed as a cable installer and attempted to break into a Vermilion Parish home.

The Vermilion Parish Sheriff’s Office says a man (pictured below) driving a white SUV attempted to break into a home on Red Rose Lane near Louisiana Highway 338 on Tuesday. Officers say he posed as a cable or security camera installer and used a suspected Wi-Fi jammer while trying to pick the front door lock.

Anyone with information about this incident is asked to contact Sheriff Chad Touchet at 337-898-4403.

Today, I would like you to ponder this question. You may be inclined to ask, "Why should I care about this?" In reply, I would like to clarify that while it may not be as urgent as issues such as texting while driving, this topic is gaining traction in current discourse. Consequently, I urge you to think critically and consider a range of options. I will also provide examples to enhance your contemplation.

Texting in public places

Today, I would like you to ponder this question. You may be questioning, "Why should I care about this?" In reply, I would like to highlight that while this matter may not be as severe as the dangers of texting while driving, it is nonetheless gaining traction in public discourse. Consequently, I ask you to reflect deeply and consider multiple angles. I will also provide examples to enrich your contemplation.

The act of texting while walking, whether you are driving or traversing a crosswalk, creates a perilous situation that endangers both your life and the lives of others. For instance, if you are focused on your phone as you approach a crosswalk, you may not notice that the light is red and that vehicles are permitted to proceed. This could lead to a scenario where you enter the roadway and are struck by a car, particularly if the driver is also distracted by their device. Alternatively, the driver may attempt to stop suddenly, risking a collision with another vehicle, or they may swerve onto the sidewalk in a desperate attempt to avoid you. The outcome of such incidents is often unpredictable and fraught with danger.

Various nations are employing distinct methods to tackle this problem. In London, for instance, one can observe mats attached to poles designed to cushion the impact for pedestrians who are texting while walking. This situation may appear comical, yet it is not so amusing for those who actually collide with the poles. Pedestrians also have the alternative of not texting while they are on the move.mobile phone jammer making your life and the lives of many people around you safer.

9 burglaries in Minnesota suspected of disabling cameras by jamming Wi-Fi

- As technology becomes cheaper and more accessible, smart security systems become vulnerable

An analysis of news reports on burglaries involving Wi-Fi jammers reveals considerable prior evidence of such incidents. In January 2020, a post on the Ring community recounted an event where a wireless doorbell from the company failed to detect a porch thief as a result of a Wi-Fi deauthentication attack. Reports of burglars employing Wi-Fi jamming tactics were also prevalent in 2021, 2022, and 2023, with an observable increase in the number of such reports over time.

Ring has been noted as a significant contributor to the video doorbell sector, which seeks to mitigate numerous home security concerns. However, it is essential to acknowledge that other wireless smart home security solutions, such as those from Blink (Amazon) and Nest (Google), are similarly vulnerable to wireless signal disruptions. Alarmingly, by 2024, the capability to jam Wi-Fi signals is projected to become quite simple for would-be thieves. Jammers can be obtained online with ease, with costs varying from $40 to $1,000. Although the use of jammer device is illegal in the United States, they can still be found readily available on the internet.

For anyone curious about the performance of a wireless component home security system, several tips can be helpful. To begin with, connect a device that provides a wired option and facilitates local storage of video footage. Additionally, consider employing smart home technology to create the appearance of activity within your home. It may also be beneficial to verify whether your system can alert you in case of a lost signal or connection, and to experiment with these settings.

Authorities in Edina, Minnesota, have linked a serial burglar to the use of a Wi-Fi jammer, which was allegedly employed to disrupt security cameras before the theft of valuables from victims. Minnesota is not commonly associated with cutting-edge technology, so it may not be unexpected that there have been reports of Wi-Fi jammers-related burglaries in the U.S. over recent years. This highlights the fact that even those engaged in criminal activities are leveraging technology, underscoring the need for homeowners to consider security enhancements.

The police department in Edina suspects that a series of nine home burglaries within the last six months were carried out with the assistance of Wi-Fi jammers, which likely hindered investigators from retrieving video evidence related to the crimes.

The thieves’ modus operandi is believed to be:

• Homes in affluent areas


• The thieves carefully monitor the homes


• The thieves avoid confrontation, so appear to wait until the homes are empty


• The thieves deploy Wi-Fi jammers when the homes are empty

Jammers are designed to confuse wireless devices rather than to block signals outright. They usually do not succeed in transmitting real traffic because they overload the wireless communication channels.