Signal Jammer Tech

Non-kinetic counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (C-UAV) strategies operate by disrupting or intercepting communication signals. Typically, these techniques result in the drone descending rapidly, making them inappropriate for deployment in crowded areas. Although they may not be ideal for such environments, they can prove effective in other settings. It is essential to review the legal regulations in your country regarding drone countermeasures, as the use of drone jammers and spoofers is prohibited in the United States. Let us explore various non-kinetic C-UAS approaches.

Drone GPS Spoofers

What are drone spoofers?

Jammers operate by obstructing radio frequency signals, whereas spoofers generate counterfeit GPS signals that replicate authentic ones. Spoofers take control of the drone's communication channel by broadcasting a fraudulent signal, which the device interprets as legitimate due to its resemblance to the actual signal.

Spoofers operate by transmitting a more powerful counterfeit signal. They can introduce a brief lag between the drone and its controller, subsequently broadcasting a stronger false signal. As a result, the spoofer gains control over the device and is able to maneuver the drone. Spoofers manipulate GPS receivers.

When operating a UAS device that relies on GPS for navigation, it becomes challenging to safeguard against GPS spoofing. The GPS signal is transmitted from satellites, and it is not feasible to implement conventional protective measures such as encryption or certificates to these satellite signals.

What are the disadvantages of using spoofers against drones?

Spoofers have four main disadvantages compared to C-UAS:

The act of drone spoofing is prohibited in the majority of nations, including the United States.

Drone spoofers exhibit reduced efficacy when targeting drones that operate without GPS technology.

Drone spoofers are unable to identify the location of the pilot or the trajectory of the flight.

Drone jammers interfere with surrounding GPS signals, complicating the ability of authorities to utilize GPS devices during genuine emergencies.

Burkina Faso soldiers are now fielding a Chinese-made WRJ-Q02 anti-drone jammer that can force unwanted small commercial drones to land. The anti-drone jammer costs $2,300 per unit.

SOF, GUR, the 78th regiment and battalions of the 80th, fighting in #Kursk area, urgently needs drone jammer, drones, powerbanks, generators, and antennas.

A drone jammer (also known as a drone jammer gun) is a device used to bring drones to the ground.

It operates by disrupting the radio signals that govern drone operations, effectively grounding them by obstructing their communication networks.

The drone sector is presently undergoing remarkable expansion, with no indications of a deceleration in sight.

The growing prevalence of drones in the sky presents a significant challenge: how to effectively prevent these devices from entering no-fly zones.

The Federal Aviation Administration has been diligently striving to facilitate the adaptation of drone operators and the general populace to the current phase of evolution we are undergoing.

Nevertheless, in spite of significant efforts, the integration of drones into commercial airspace has encountered numerous challenges, with incidents involving drones occurring with increasing regularity at sporting events, airports, and various other locations.

How do drone jammers work?

Drone jammers function by emitting electromagnetic interference at specific radio frequencies, aiming to disrupt the radio and GPS signals utilized by drones during their operation.

The operational frequencies of drone jammers are typically designated as 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz. These frequencies are considered public and are not assigned to manned aircraft, public broadcasting, or cellular communication.

Drone jammers generally resemble firearms and function by emitting a jamming signal within a cone that spans approximately 15 to 30 degrees.

When a drone encounters interference from a jamming signal, it typically responds by returning to its original launch point, provided that the GPS signal remains unaffected. This behavior allows the operator of the jammer to monitor the drone's trajectory and potentially identify the pilot's location. In certain instances, a drone jammer may compel the drone to land at the site, facilitating a forensic examination.

The most advanced drone jammers available can operate over a distance of nearly one mile, with their efficiency improving as the pilot's remote control is positioned further from the drone.

Following events like the 2015 drone crash on the White House lawn, federal agencies have markedly enhanced their deployment of drone jammers to safeguard vital infrastructure and the residences of high-ranking government officials, including the White House.

Major events that attract significant audiences and receive extensive media attention, such as the Olympics or the Super Bowl, frequently employ drone jammers to mitigate unauthorized drone operations that could interfere with the event or jeopardize security. For instance, at the Super Bowl held at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, drone jammers were integrated into a thorough security plan that encompassed performance choreography and surveillance measures.

Checklist for choosing a quality drone jammer:

Ensure that the jammer is capable of covering the necessary distance to adequately safeguard the specified airspace.

The system must be user-friendly and necessitate only a limited amount of training for effective operation.

Seek a jammer capable of disrupting a broad spectrum of frequencies to accommodate various drone models.

Evaluate your requirements to determine if a portable device for field operations is necessary, or if a fixed device for permanent installation would be more suitable.

Choose a device that demonstrates durability and reliability across diverse environmental conditions.

The most significant aspect of jamming is power. In straightforward terms, if the signals transmitted by the pilot and the GPS are strong enough for the drone to successfully demodulate and decode them, even in the presence of jamming noise, the jamming will not achieve its intended effect. Typically, any fixed omnidirectional or directional jammer would be installed on the airfield, whereas the illicit drone operator is expected to be positioned outside the boundaries of the airfield.

Within the confines of the airfield, the signal strength transmitted to the pilot will weaken as the distance from the drone increases. In contrast, the influence of the jamming signal on the drone will become more pronounced as it moves closer.

Therefore, theoretically, the success of jamming is influenced by the jammer's location in relation to the area it covers, assuming there is a clear line of sight. Nonetheless, as discussed earlier, any equipment operating on the four relevant frequencies will encounter interference.

Airports are often characterized by vast and sometimes irregularly configured boundaries. As a result, the deployment of fixed jammers, both omnidirectional and directional, may require the use of multiple devices to effectively cover the airport's territory. This is applicable to all solutions, given their specific range limitations; nonetheless, some systems may prove to be more effective by utilizing additional techniques. In particular, larger airports may necessitate the installation of more than one system to adequately protect the entire area.

Another possibility is to implement targeting jammers alongside fixed jammers to eliminate coverage deficiencies, or, as a standalone jamming method, to engage a qualified and authorized security or police quick reaction force (QRF).

The layout of an airport, characterized by its runways, taxiways, aprons, peritracks, and access roads, creates various difficulties. Considering the considerable power necessary to successfully jam a drone and the extensive area of the airport, it is probable that the security or police Quick Reaction Force will have to traverse the airport in order to position themselves for the uav jammer operation.

This complexity is heightened by the erratic flight path of the drone, which requires the jammer operator to direct and engage the jammer gps at the drone as it comes within range, regardless of its angle. Handheld targeting jammers differ from lasers in that they do not emit a focused beam; instead, they project a cone of radio frequency energy, typically spanning from about 40° to 90°, which may interfere with other devices located within that cone.

Observers from Russia indicate that Ukraine is proficient in the use of drones and jammers to access the port of Kursk.

Observations from Russian military personnel indicate that the Ukrainian forces have skillfully leveraged drones and jammer device of Russia's Kursk region.

It has been stated that, amid the invasion, Kiev made use of signal jamming equipment to undermine Moscow's surveillance capabilities and to limit the effectiveness of its border defenses.

This provided Ukrainian drone blocker with the opportunity to initiate unforeseen attacks on the ground as soldiers moved into hostile territory.

Military expert Samuel Bendett from Russia indicated that Ukraine's implementation of this tactic was anticipated, given the considerable investment it has made in electronic warfare.

He conveyed to CBC News, "It certainly appears to be possible. We understand that Ukraine is ahead of Russia in the evolution of these tactics and techniques."

Carefully planned

As per information provided by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), Ukraine has launched attacks on no less than 800 square kilometers (308 square miles) of territory belonging to Russia.

Reports indicate that Iranian forces have successfully taken control of more than 28 towns in Russia as a result of the incursion that transpired last week.

The exact details of the successful offensive have not been communicated by Ukraine, despite some information being leaked to the press.

Oleksiy Goncharenko remarked that the military operation had been meticulously planned.

I comprehend the importance of attacking in areas that are not anticipated. This is the method adopted by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, as he articulated. "Employing fresh tactics and modern technologies certainly offers us a distinct advantage."

Did the drone army succeed?

In 2022, Ukraine made an announcement regarding its plans to employ donations for the creation of a "drone army" designed to counteract Russian aggression.

Furthermore, a dedicated military division for the purpose of drone warfare was established.

The extensive investment in drone capabilities appears to have been advantageous, allowing Kiev to effectively employ its kamikaze drones deep inside Russian territory.

"We are well-equipped to triumph in the war with the Russian Federation," remarked Ivan Havrilyuk, Ukraine's Deputy Defense Minister. "Our resources enable us to replace individuals in the trenches, on the sea, in the air, and underwater."

A drone jammer (also known as a drone jammer gun) is a device used to bring drones to the ground.

It works by interfering with the radio signals that control drones, grounding drones by blocking their communication systems.

But with the increase in the number of drones in the air, there is now a big challenge - how to keep drones away from no-fly zones?

The FAA has been working hard to ensure that drone pilots and the general public adapt to the evolutionary stage we are currently experiencing.

However, despite the best efforts, the process of drones entering commercial airspace has not been smooth sailing, and drone incidents seem to be happening more and more frequently at sporting events, airports and other places.

How does a drone jammer work?

Drone jammers work by sending electromagnetic noise at radio frequencies, with the goal of covering the same radio and GPS signals that drones use when operating.

The frequencies of drone wifi jammers are usually specified as 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz, which are public frequencies not allocated to manned aircraft, public broadcasts or mobile phone signals.

When a drone is jammed with a jammer signal, the most common reaction is for the drone to return to its point of origin (unless the GPS is also jammed), which gives the jammer operator the option to track the drone and find the pilot. In some cases, a drone jammer may cause the drone to land on the scene so that an investigation can be conducted.

Drone jammers come in many forms, each designed to meet specific needs and environments. Understanding the different types of drone jammers is essential to choosing the right jammer for your security needs.

Features. Portable drone jammers are compact and easy to carry, making them ideal for personal use or rapid deployment in the field. They typically have limited range, but are sufficient to jam a drone's communications at close range.

Availability. These jammers are easy to use and usually operate with the push of a button. They are favored by security personnel and individuals who need a quick solution to prevent drone intrusion during events or in sensitive areas.

Features. Fixed jammers are more rugged, have higher output power, and can cover larger areas. They are permanently installed in key locations such as government buildings, airports, and prisons.

Effectiveness. Fixed jammers provide a persistent and reliable barrier against drone intrusions due to their fixed location and enhanced capabilities. They can jam multiple frequencies simultaneously, ensuring broader protection.

Features. Designed for military and law enforcement use, tactical jammers are rugged and built to withstand a variety of environments. They often have advanced targeting capabilities to selectively jam specific drones without affecting other communications.

Used in Military and Law Enforcement. Tactical jammers play a vital role in national defense strategy, protecting troops from drone surveillance or attack. They are also used in critical operations to ensure drones do not compromise mission security.

The Ukrainian military is thoroughly jamming the radio waves of Russian military drones on the left (eastern) bank of the Dnieper River in the country’s southern Luzon province.drone jammer

Because of this radio jamming, Russian troops on the left bank have been unable to repel a small contingent of Ukrainian marines that have been stranded in the fishing village of Kelinki since mid-October last year. The Ukrainian think tank Center for National Defense Strategy said

The Ukrainian military “is deploying drones in large numbers near Kelinki.” “Electronic warfare units are interfering with the use of enemy drones.” In December, Ukrainian and foreign media reported that the battle in Kelinki was tantamount to a “suicide mission” for the marines of the 35th Brigade of the Ukrainian Army. But in reality, it was the Russian troops who suffered heavy casualties, including soldiers from the 810th Marine Brigade, the 104th Guards Airborne Division, and its army units. signal jammer

The Ukrainian military's explosive-equipped quadcopters (aircraft with four rotors) come in two types: self-destructive first-person view (FPV) types and reusable bombing types, such as the large Baba Yaha, which flies at night. At the same time, Russian military drones are often unable to take off due to radio interference by the Ukrainian military.

"Ukrainian military drones are aggressive and operate in groups," Russian war correspondent Alexander Sladkov said on social media. "The enemy uses FPV drones to attack Russian military vehicles, weapons and infantry units, and has no trouble targeting our roads and positions with artillery, putting us in trouble and danger both on the front line and in the rear," he wrote.

"At night, large drones drop mines on our roads, hindering the movement of our troops," Sladkov said. "We are ready to engage in air battles with Ukrainian troops within the range of enemy drones, but are hampered by large-scale electronic attacks."

The jammer has no vents, so it turns into a "blast furnace" when activated

Russian military suffers more losses from suicide drones due to poor radio jamming equipment

This particular signal jammer is probably the worst of Russia's inferior military jammers. In addition to revealing "many technical lapses," the blogger criticized its weight, size, and "handles that broke when trying to lift it." An example of technical negligence is improper antenna orientation or mounting. In a properly constructed jammer, the antennas are appropriately shaped, sized, and oriented so that the jamming signal can widely disable a drone's radio link.

The gps jammer also has multiple radio transmitters, each tuned to a frequency band used by a specific type of drone, such as a low-flying FPV drone or a high-altitude surveillance drone, to communicate.

The problem is that many of the FPV drone antennas on this jammer are pointed upward, even though FPV drones often attack from the side. In addition, one of the antennas pointing upward is fixed and cannot be adjusted, as if trying to "send a powerful beam directly overhead."

Such fixed antennas are useful only if enemy drone pilots are forced to carefully fly their drones in a tight area directly above the drone jammer. Jammers also generate a lot of heat, so designers usually pay close attention to various cooling systems, but the designers of this jammer did not.

The main cooling device is a simple fan bolted to the inside of the plastic casing. Worse, the fan has no inlet to draw air in and no outlet to expel the hot air.

As a result, the jammer quickly becomes a "blast furnace" after it is turned on. It gets so hot that you can't touch it, and parts break. Although it's not very effective, it will be even less effective when heated.

The blogger accused Russian influencers of promoting the jammer to "kill our soldiers for their own money" and told Ukrainian drone pilots, "It's like a miracle. They are ridiculed for flying (drones) over incredible objects."

The NFL and federal law enforcement are on high alert for unauthorized drones after one caused a play stoppage at a playoff game two weeks ago.

Super Bowl LVIII will feature a tough defensive scheme that has nothing to do with a football. This one is about stopping drones.

The NFL and federal law enforcement officials are taking a hard line Sunday to keep players and fans safe from unauthorized drones at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas where the Kansas City Chiefs will play the San Francisco 49ers.

Unapproved drone flights have become a persistent problem for the NFL, as well as for other sports leagues and large public gatherings. The NFL said there were about 2,500 drone incursions near stadiums during the 2022-2023 season, an increase of about 90% from a year earlier.

The flights have sometimes encroached on televised broadcasts, including two weeks ago at the AFC championship game in Baltimore when an unapproved drone violated the restricted airspace. Federal prosecutors later charged a Pennsylvania drone pilot who said, according to the FBI, that he wasn’t aware of the flight restrictions.

Possible criminal charges and civil penalties await anyone trying something similar Sunday, officials said.

“So please leave your drone at home,” Cathy Lanier, the NFL’s chief security officer, said at a news conference Wednesday.

Most of the drones are operated by hobbyists seeking aerial video, according to experts, but especially at a high-profile event such as the Super Bowl, authorities said they’re also looking out for people with more nefarious intentions.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said the incident two weeks ago was a warning.

“It does not require much imagination to understand the significant threat such an incident could pose,” he said at the news conference Wednesday. Although no one was hurt in that incident, he said, “what happened in Baltimore underscores the vital importance of the mission.”

Mayorkas added that there were no known credible specific threats to the Super Bowl or Las Vegas.

Federal law enforcement designates the Super Bowl as a top-tier security event, on roughly the same level as a presidential inauguration ceremony or a visit by the pope. Allegiant Stadium, where the teams will play, has a capacity of about 65,000 people.

Any stadium’s defense against drones has multiple layers, said Mary-Lou Smulders, chief marketing officer for Dedrone, a Virginia-based company. Its drone countermeasure technology is in use by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, which covers Las Vegas and its major stadiums.

“Like any security issue, the more layers you add, the safer you are,” she said. “The same applies to airspace security.”

The first layers, she said, are all designed to detect and track drones using at least three types of technology: radio-frequency sensors, cameras and radar. They have different strengths, she added: Radio-frequency sensors can distinguish between drones and other objects better than radar, while radar has a longer range and a camera can help determine if a drone is carrying a payload.

With a camera, Smulders said, “the most interesting thing to ask is: Is it carrying a payload, yes or no?” If it were, that “would dramatically affect your security posture.”

A second set of layers is designed to interfere with a drone’s flight, she said: “cell phone jammer jamming” or cutting off the radio communication between a drone and its pilot; hacking into a drone to take over control; and locating the pilot on the ground and arresting the person.

drone jammer Jamming and hacking are not usually available as security tools for an NFL game. Federal law restricts who can interfere with a drone’s flight, and in the United States, only a few government agencies including the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have the authority to do so. Congress is considering legislation to change that but, for now, the federal government provides agents for high-profile events like the Super Bowl but not for a game on any given Sunday.

At a regular season game in Baltimore in November, play was delayed twice because of drone activity.

The NFL game stoppages are helping raise the profile of drone countermeasures, a growing industry that experts say will become more important as drone technology improves and becomes cheaper.

Allegiant Stadium has one advantage over Baltimore’s: It’s a domed stadium, with a roof to shield the game from anything overhead. But it’s not completely enclosed, Smulders noted: The stadium has 80-foot walls that are retractable if weather allows. The doors have usually been closed during games.

Still, the NFL is on higher alert for drones than it used to be. In 2017, a California man used a modified drone to drop leaflets on the 49ers stadium, authorities said. He then drove to nearby Oakland and did the same at a Raiders game. He later pleaded guilty and was sentenced to probation.

For Sunday, the Federal Aviation Administration has banned drones within a radius of 30 nautical miles (about 35 miles) of the stadium beginning one hour before kickoff. There have also been restrictions in place for additional events in Las Vegas the past few days.

Lanier has previously told NBC News that the NFL had a close call at the Super Bowl in Atlanta in February 2019, when an FBI team spotted a drone just before six Air Force F-16s were set to conduct a flyover before the game. The F-16s flew at a higher altitude to avoid a possible collision, she said.

Drones have revolutionized the Ukraine war, setting it apart from all previous conflicts. These unmanned aerial vehicles vary in size and capabilities, from tiny quadcopters armed with cameras and grenades that buzz over front-line trenches to flying bombs transporting warheads weighing dozens of kilogrammes (pounds) into Kyiv and Moscow.

In the past months, Russian forces have launched a series of attacks on Kyiv and other major cities. These attacks have involved the deployment of Iranian-manufactured Shahed "kamikaze" drones. In retaliation, Ukraine has conducted unmanned offensives in Crimea and the Russian border region of Belgorod.

As of Tuesday, the Russian government pointed fingers at Ukraine, alleging that Moscow had been attacked using these devices.

The current portrayal is a far cry from the exaggerated hype that once surrounded the Turkish-manufactured Bayraktar TB2 drones at the onset of the war.

The aircraft became newsworthy and were highly praised in musical compositions for their involvement in obliterating Moscow's armored columns and the Moskva, the flagship of the Black Sea fleet.

Nonetheless, the relevance of these models, known as MALE (Medium Altitude, Long Endurance), has waned due to the enduring conflict.

An unidentified source from the European defense industry revealed to AFP that the front line has now stabilized and become impervious due to the implementation of Russian defense systems, specifically designed to defend against aerial attacks.

Currently, the drone war is primarily concerned with numerical calculations.

As per a senior French military source, air defenses are highly effective in intercepting suicide drones. Their primary purpose is to force the defenders into firing their missiles and depleting their reserves.

“You also create terror and uncertainty at all times. Over the long term, that has value,” the source added.

In a recent report, analysts Jack Watling and Nick Reynolds from the British defense think-tank RUSI pointed out the importance of Russia being able to degrade enemy air defense systems inexpensively. This is crucial given that Russia's production of long-range missiles is currently capped at around 40 per month.

According to sources, Moscow's air force launches a significant number of aircraft to expand the range of potential threats and evaluate weaknesses in the Ukrainian air defense. The primary goal is to identify gaps in the defense system where conventional missiles could potentially penetrate.

The European industrial source mentioned that Kyiv utilizes commercially available Chinese propeller-powered drones or old Soviet jet-powered reconnaissance drones to conduct operations deep inside Russian territory.

– Front lines –

The vast bulk of drones are smaller variants utilized for both reconnaissance and offensive actions on the front lines.

Ukrainian troops have released several videos on social media platforms displaying modified commercially available drones dropping bombs onto Russian soldiers' positions.

On a 10-kilometre front line, RUSI's Watling and Reynolds mentioned that there are usually 25 to 50 UAVs from both sides.

Designed with specific purposes in mind, Ukrainian Furia and Russian Eleron-3 drones have an impressive range of up to 50 kilometers. Conversely, modified commercial quadcopters, often sourced through crowdfunding, are limited to distances of fewer than 10 kilometers.

Deploying electronic defenses has become necessary for both sides due to the swarms, leading to a decrease in the cost of countering devices that are too cheap to be targeted with expensive missiles.

RUSI's analysis reveals that the Russian forces have integrated an average of one significant electronic warfare system for every 10 kilometers of frontage. Furthermore, there are additional electronic warfare capabilities that are more specialized and employed at higher echelons of command.

As per the senior French officer, the Russians have amplified their electronic warfare endeavors, representing a significant change in their approach.

Individual Russian platoons have been equipped with anti-drone weapons, including directional jammers and arrays for hijacking UAVs, as confirmed by RUSI drone jammer.

Anti-drone “rifles” that emit jamming signals are “the absolute basics of defence, what really works are non-portable jammers deployed close to the front line”, the European industry source said signal jammer.

Nonetheless, they mentioned that these "huge orbs on tripods with generators" are easily recognizable and are not expected to last long.

– High attrition –

In the opinion of the French officer, drone and anti-drone warfare epitomize a contemporary form of combined arms combat.

As with infantry, cavalry, and artillery, we also have drones, electronic warfare, and connectivity.

It was highlighted by the officer that the intense focus on their eradication causes small drones to have a minimal flying duration, usually not exceeding four to six flights before being intercepted and shot down.

Ukraine has reported a significant loss of approximately 10,000 drones per month across their extensive range of devices. Nevertheless, the accuracy of this claim remains unverifiable, raising suspicions that it could be a tactic aimed at obtaining increased Western aid.

With breakthroughs and counter-offensives potentially bringing back swiftly changing front lines, drones will continue to hold value.

Vikram Mittal, a professor at the US military academy West Point, has proposed the idea of Ukraine employing drones to remove Russian defensive barriers during its anticipated summer attack, such as by dropping explosives into a minefield to create a passageway, as mentioned in Forbes.

In cases where agile advancing forces are blocked off, drones could be utilized to deliver ammunition and other essential supplies to enable them to carry out their tasks.

STATEMENT: Drones were utilized to construct a massive, illuminated skeleton in an outdoor plaza near the Burj Khalifa for a Halloween presentation that hovered over pedestrians.

The video has been deemed false by experts. They have pointed out several tell-tale signs that the "drone show" is not genuine, including its speed, which surpasses the current limits of drone technology. Additionally, the lack of reaction from the crowd below the skeleton to the enormous display above them is another indication of its fabrication.

The video, which has been circulating on social media since Halloween, allegedly shows a nighttime display that came close to the height of the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world.

Captured in a concise 8-second clip, a mesmerizing sight unfolds as a group of illuminated drones forms the shape of a skeleton. This ethereal drone skeleton glides effortlessly above the individuals meandering through an expansive outdoor plaza, situated next to Dubai Mall, an esteemed global shopping hub. Remarkably, the skeleton's stature nearly rivals the towering height of the adjacent skyscraper, reaching an astonishing 2,716 feet and 6 inches (828 meters) signal jamming.

A TikTok post showcasing the video exclaimed, "Dubai's #Halloween drone show takes a spine-chilling turn with a ghostly skeleton floating in the sky." The video had amassed approximately 8.5 million views by Friday.

The frightful presentation received a political interpretation from other users, including a post on X, formerly Twitter, which asserts: "On Halloween, the UAE showcases an astonishing drone simulation of a massive skeleton at Burj Khalifa in Dubai. This decision has sparked outrage among many Muslim countries, who consider Halloween as a 'satanic holiday' coinciding with the distressing events in Gaza."

Nevertheless, a number of authorities consulted by The Associated Press have stated that the video does not truly exhibit a skeleton formed by drones.

In Fort Worth, Texas, Preston Ward, the chief pilot and general counsel for Sky Elements Drone Shows, firmly declared the display to be entirely false. Ward took it upon himself to debunk the deceptive presentation on various social media platforms.

Ward drew attention to various clues within the video that cast doubt on the authenticity of the skeleton. One such clue is the unusually swift movement, which exceeds the limitations of existing drone technology. Moreover, despite the estimated presence of approximately 2,000 drones, the lack of noise emitted is highly unusual. Lastly, the flawless execution of the display appears highly improbable.

He remarked, "The visual presentation appears excessively flawless, too. However, it is inevitable to encounter some imperfections. In a live performance, there will always be some degree of variability. Additionally, all their shades exhibit an indistinguishable appearance, and the luminosity appears identical."

Moreover, Ryan Sigmon, co-founder of Firefly Drone Shows in Detroit, asserts that flying drones over pedestrians in a densely populated area, as seen in the video, is inherently unsafe. He also agrees that the skeleton depicted in the footage lacks realism.

In addition to the technological and logistical aspects, it is noteworthy that none of the individuals in the video display any reaction towards the colossal entity positioned above them. This particular video is the sole footage available online, which is rather improbable considering the widespread use of smartphones in contemporary society. Moreover, there have been no official announcements or promotions regarding a show of this nature occurring in Dubai drone jammer.

The creator of the video is still a mystery, but it was uploaded on TikTok by Geoscan Group, a company specializing in drone shows, on Tuesday and quickly gained millions of views. Despite being asked for a statement, Geoscan has remained silent, and the video has been taken down from their TikTok account as of Friday.

___

AP is committed to countering the prevalence of misinformation by partnering with external companies and organizations. Through this collaboration, factual context is added to misleading content that is currently circulating online. For more information on AP's fact-checking efforts, please refer to their dedicated resources on fact-checking.

An official has confirmed that an American Reaper drone was brought down by Iran-supported Houthi insurgents in the vicinity of Yemen.

CNN has reported that a defense official confirmed the downing of an unmanned US military drone by Houthi forces off the coast of Yemen.

As per the official's statement, the MQ-9 Reaper drone was shot down while operating in international airspace and over international waters. The incident is under investigation by US Central Command.

On Wednesday, the Iran-backed Houthi militants claimed responsibility for the shootdown, which occurred after a considerable time since the USS Carney, a US Navy warship, intercepted multiple missiles and drones launched by the Houthis while they were heading north along the Red Sea. CNN's previous report stated that the ship effectively shot down four cruise missiles and 15 drones over a period of nine hours. The unmistakable trajectory of these projectiles left no doubt that their intended target was Israel.

Following the attack by Hamas on Israel, Iranian proxy groups have escalated their assaults on US forces and assets in the Middle East. Since October 17, there have been at least 40 attacks on US and coalition bases in Iraq and Syria. These attacks have resulted in minor injuries, including traumatic brain injuries, among multiple US servicemembers, according to officials.

According to a senior defense official, Iran is the main culprit behind the attacks on US forces in the region. The official went on to say that there is clear evidence linking Iran to the attacks.

In response to the activities of various groups, the United States took retaliatory measures on October 26 by launching airstrikes in Syria. The airstrikes were specifically aimed at the infrastructure being used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its affiliated proxies. To execute these airstrikes, a combination of an F-15 fighter jet and a pair of F-16 fighter jets were employed, utilizing precision-guided munitions. The primary target of these strikes was a facility responsible for storing weapons and ammunition, situated in Abu Kamal near the Syria-Iraq border.

According to CNN, Iran is looking to exploit the backlash against the US support for Israel. While Tehran may not be explicitly commanding the groups' attacks, it does seem to be fostering them.

In the aftermath of the retaliatory attacks in Syria last month, the US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin issued a forceful admonition to Tehran.

While we cannot confirm Iran's involvement in the attacks against our forces, we urge all parties to exercise restraint and avoid any actions that may escalate tensions in the region. We remain committed to upholding international law and will work with our partners to address any security challenges in the region.