Signal Jammer Tech

The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, prohibits the operation, manufacture, importation, marketing, and sale of equipment designed to jam or otherwise interfere with authorized radio communications, such as radar, global positioning system (GPS), and cell phone communications. These jamming device pose significant risks to public safety and potentially compromise other radio communications services.

• Section 301 of the Act requires a valid FCC authorization or license for the operation of radio transmitting equipment. Unlike other radio transmitting equipment, jamming equipment cannot be authorized by the FCC because the main purpose of jamming equipment is to interfere with radio communications.


• Section 302(b) of the Act prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, offer for sale, or operation of devices that do not comply with the equipment authorization rules. Jammers do not comply with the rules because they are designed to jam or disrupt authorized communications.


• Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed by or authorized under the Act, or operated by the United States Government.


• Consequently, the operation of jamming equipment violates Sections 301 and 333 of the Act. The manufacture, importation, sale, or offer for sale of jamming equipment violates Section 302(b) of the Act.


• As a result of past enforcement efforts, jammers are rarely marketed by domestic entities and now are almost exclusively marketed online by foreign retailers. When the retailer is located outside of U.S. territory, The Hague Convention on Service Abroad may apply and require that Commission documents only be served in a manner prescribed by authorities in the retailer’s country of residence.


• The Enforcement Bureau has released Enforcement Advisories specifically designed to inform retailers, importers, consumers, and state and local government agencies that jammers are illegal and may not be operated, marketed or imported into the United States. The Advisories warn that violators risk substantial civil and criminal penalties.




• Warning: Jammer Use By the Public and Local Law Enforcement Is Illegal


• CONSUMER ALERT: Using or Importing Jammers is Illegal


• FCC ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY, Cell Jammers, GPS jammers, and Other Jamming Devices




• See the Jammer Enforcement webpage for more information.

The rise of the Internet of Things has led to an increasing demand for location services. According to certain institutions, it is predicted that 60% of Internet of Things devices will rely on geographical location data. Outdoor positioning, in particular, is expected to be a significant market that should not be overlooked.

The GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) is a highly esteemed international club comprising of merely four members, which garners the interest of global leaders and the scrutiny of numerous esteemed scientists and engineers. These four members include the GPS of the United States, GALILEO Galileo of Europe, GLONASS of Russia, and Beidou COMPASS of China.

There are four prominent satellite navigation systems worldwide, including China's Beidou satellite navigation system, the United States Global Positioning System (GPS), the European Union's Galileo satellite system (GALILEO), and Russia's GLONASS satellite system (GLONASS). These four systems are acknowledged as suppliers by the United Nations Satellite Navigation Committee.

China Beidou is a recent addition, yet it stands out as the most dynamic member in terms of development. What exactly is Beidou and how does it influence our daily lives? This intriguing subject has garnered significant attention. Numerous scholarly publications delve into the intricacies of Beidou; however, these professional articles often employ jargon that may deter the interest of the general public.

Small GPS signal blockers great use

The GPS satellite positioning system is the most widely used satellite positioning system globally. It enables vehicle tracking, route navigation, information inquiry, traffic command, emergency assistance, and various other functionalities. While the GPS satellite positioning system has brought immense convenience to our lives, it has also given rise to certain challenges that pose a potential risk to personal safety.

For instance, when dealing with mortgage car companies, the original owner of the car temporarily relinquishes control of the vehicle in exchange for monetary assistance. To prevent any unauthorized retrieval of the car by the original owner, these companies opt to purchase GPS shields. These shields are then installed in the vehicle's parking lot and on the car, making it impossible for the original owner to track the vehicle. This measure effectively safeguards the property's security.

The market for GPS locators is witnessing significant growth, leading to a surge in demand for GPS signal blockers. These blockers are sought after by individuals who desire to evade GPS signal tracking. Nevertheless, it is essential to evaluate the actual effectiveness of GPS signal blockers in shielding signal tracking.

Most GPS locators can be effectively shielded by
gps blocker. The use of blockers disrupts the normal functioning of the GPS locator, preventing complete data transmission to the locator monitoring platform. Similar to mobile phones, GPS locators require the insertion of a mobile phone card or an Internet of Things card to retrieve data. Therefore, as long as the GPS signal blocker can obstruct the signal transmission of the mobile phone card, it can also block the GPS locator.

What to Do if Authorized Communication is Being Jammed

Do you suspect that a signal jammers may be causing interference? Bad network connections can be caused by a variety of factors including:

• faulty equipment


• physical obstructions that block the signal

Before filing an interference complaint via the FCC Consumer Complaint Center, you should troubleshoot equipment and connectivity issues in accordance with manufacturer and service provider recommendations. In addition to consulting your owner’s manual and the company’s tech support, searching the Internet for your device/model and specific issue may help to either identify or rule out possible causes.

Cell Phone Jamming is Prohibited in the USA

Like many countries, the United States prohibits the employment of mobile signal jammer in practically every use case.

According to the Federal Communications Commission, “Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing, or sale of any type of jamming equipment that interferes with authorized radio communications, including cellular and Personal Communication Services (PCS), police radar, and Global Positioning Systems (GPS).”

It is also illegal to sell, distribute, advertise, import, or market jamming devices to consumers in the United States. The use or marketing of a jammer in the U.S. may subject a person to:

1. significant monetary penalties (fines of up to $11,000)


2. seizure of the unlawful equipment


3. criminal sanctions including imprisonment

There are no exemptions for use within a residence, business, vehicle, or classroom. Local law enforcement agencies do not have independent authority to use jamming equipment. Jamming equipment employment by federal law enforcement agencies is authorized in accordance with applicable statutes only in certain limited exceptions.

Though signal jamming is prohibited, cell phone detectors are legal in the United States.

Cell Phone Jammers – 3 Reasons Why They’re Illegal

Cell phone jammers can prevent you and other persons from making 911 and other emergency calls. They can also create dangerous risks to public safety communications in addition to interfering with other forms of daily communication.

In a renewed effort, state prosecutors from various states are urging Congress to pass legislation that would grant state prisons the ability to disrupt cellphone signals used by inmates. These prosecutors assert that these devices enable prisoners to coordinate acts of violence and perpetrate criminal offenses.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, along with a group of 22 Republican prosecutors, composed a letter to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. The prosecutors urged Congress to enact legislation that would authorize states to implement a cell phone jamming system. This system is deemed crucial for the protection of inmates, guards, and the wider public.

Wilson's office has expressed their intention to establish contact with Democratic state prosecutors, emphasizing that the matter is not influenced by political affiliation.

A letter, presented to The Associated Press, has been provided by the attorneys. This letter highlights a few criminal incidents that were reportedly coordinated by prisoners using contraband cellphones. Among these incidents are a drug conspiracy in Tennessee and a double homicide hit that was allegedly ordered by an inmate from Indiana.

Additionally, reference was made to a siege in 2018 that was linked to gang activity and occurred at a prison in South Carolina. This prolonged incident lasted for more than seven hours and claimed the lives of seven inmates. A chilling account provided by one prisoner depicted the disturbing sight of bodies stacked on top of each other, resembling a sinister woodpile. Corrections officials attributed the orchestrated violence, which is considered the worst prison riot in the United States in the past 25 years, partially to the use of illegal cellphones.

In their statement, the prosecutors highlighted that blocking inmates' access to contraband cell phones would play a pivotal role in preventing the occurrence of serious drug trafficking, violent riots, and other criminal acts.

To render the phones worthless, which are often smuggled into state prisons through various means such as being hidden inside hollowed-out footballs, facilitated by corrupt employees, and sometimes even dropped using drones, prosecutors are advocating for a change in a federal communications law that has been in place for almost a century. This change would allow state prisons to utilize jamming signal technology to nullify illegal cell signals.

The relentless pursuit to curb the use of illicit cellphones in state prisons has been underway for years. South Carolina Corrections Director Bryan Stirling has played a pivotal role in leading a collective effort among corrections directors across the nation, advocating for the implementation of more advanced technology to combat the proliferation of contraband phones.

A momentous victory was achieved in 2021 when the Federal Communications Commission adopted a ruling allowing state prison systems to apply for permits to detect and deactivate illegal cell signals, individually and in partnership with cellphone providers. South Carolina took the initiative to apply for this technology, but Stirling stated to AP on Tuesday that no action has been taken on the state's application.

It was noted by Stirling that federal prisons have the ability to jam cell signals within their facilities, but they have chosen not to utilize this capability at the moment.

CTIA, a wireless industry group, is firmly against the use of jamming technology, citing concerns over its interference with legal phone calls. However, as outlined in a 2020 FCC document, CTIA has informed the commission that it has been working in collaboration with its member companies to effectively terminate service to illegal devices as mandated by court orders they have obtained.

Calling combating contraband phones “a serious issue,” CTIA officials said in a statement to the AP that the “wireless industry remains committed to working with corrections officials and policymakers at all levels of government to implement effective solutions that combat contraband phones while protecting lawful communications.”

An email seeking comment on the renewed push for jamming has been sent, but the FCC officials have not yet responded.

In the past, Congress has explored the possibility of enacting jamming legislation, but no bills have been signed into law or even granted a hearing. U.S. Senator Tom Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas, reintroduced a similar measure during the previous Congress in August.

“We’re not going to stop advocating,” Wilson told AP on Tuesday. “I can only hope that at some point, Congress is going to take note.”

As the exam draws near, the adoption of 5G signal jammers has gained significant traction. These jammers are being actively marketed and utilized, particularly in renowned schools where exam mobile phone jammer are visibly present in examination venues. The increasing installation of this equipment in educational institutions prompts the question: what drives this trend?

Mariam Aly, a faculty member at Columbia University, has made extensive efforts to combat cheating among her students. In her cognitive neuroscience class, she provides her students with a week to complete an open-book exam. Furthermore, as an integral component of this exam, all the approximately 180 students enrolled in the class are required to endorse an honor code.

However, cheating remains prevalent. Addressing student misconduct, she describes it as the most difficult aspect of her job. Aly explains, "It creates an uncomfortable and distressing scenario for everyone involved." She adds, "Assigning blame becomes incredibly challenging. One cannot help but feel a sense of disappointment and frustration."

She acknowledges that her students are confronted with unparalleled levels of stress and uncertainty. She sympathizes with them, as she herself never had the experience of attending school during a pandemic.

The extent to which something becomes popular is determined by the demand it receives. This is primarily due to the escalating problem of cheating, which has become increasingly prevalent in recent years, with the frequent emergence of various intimidating cheating methods.

In order to efficiently resolve the issue, a specific type of shielding equipment is employed within the examination room to counter the cheating caused by electronic signals. This equipment's introduction significantly aids numerous examinations, prompting an escalating number of individuals to opt for its implementation as a preventive measure against cheating.

The exam signal blocker mentioned here possesses the capability to effectively hinder the communication signals of 5G mobile phones, while also proficiently blocking 2.4G and 5.8G WIFI signals. This ensures that individuals utilizing mobile phones or certain electronic products are unable to send or receive signals within the designated range covered by this shielding mechanism.

Irrespective of the product, only this guarantee can ensure fairness for individuals facing challenges in their exams, and this exam signal jammer operates with utmost quietness and absence of noise. This shielding method poses no harm to the human body whatsoever, enabling candidates to take the exam with a sense of tranquility.

Generally, the FCC considers the use of cellular phone jammers as illegal since they disrupt the communication networks utilized by emergency personnel, who heavily rely on the same frequency as cell phones for a significant portion of their communications, as well as their own use of mobile phones.However, the use of signal jammers has been advocated by prisons, schools, and city governments. These entities aim to curb cheating in educational settings, ensure the undivided attention of taxi drivers and limo drivers on their routes, and restrict prisoners from using illicit cell phones.

Wave Bubble Cell Phone Jammers

As the use of cell phone jammers is unlawful, individuals are left with two options: procuring them illegally from overseas or constructing them illicitly at home. This requires a certain level of expertise in working with chips and antennae. The Wave Bubble Jammer, in particular, has the capability to interfere with various radio frequencies beyond the scope of cell phones.For power supply, the installation of a lithium-ion battery is required, offering a jamming duration of up to two to four hours, depending on the frequencies present in its vicinity. Recharging can be accomplished through a USB connector or a common 4 mm DC jack. Moreover, AAA batteries can be used as an alternative power source.

The jammer's microchips are fitted with two antennae that can detect multiple frequencies within a twenty to twenty-five foot radius.The successful implementation of this device requires a considerable amount of challenging SMT soldering. This involves installing multiple TSSOP and SOT chips, 0603 RC's, as well as obscure components. Additionally, the proper construction and debugging of the device necessitate the use of specific equipment.As this device is illegal within the United States, the specific sources for these are not accessible.

Cell Phones Modified to Jammers

Certain cell phone jammer have been altered from old cell phones to function on the same frequency as the targeted device, emitting a tone that renders holding a conversation on the phone unachievable. It is important to bear in mind that these jammers are illegal and constructing them without expertise in soldering microchips and manipulating radio frequencies is a challenging endeavor.Police CB radios adopt a similar approach to cell phone jammers, as they scan and intercept all frequencies present in their immediate surroundings, enabling seamless communication over the CB. Conversely, cell phone jammers extend their functionality by obstructing transmissions.

The presence of a considerable array of malicious wireless devices, specifically designed to disrupt wireless networks through intentional interference, is a matter of grave concern. Despite their evident illegality, these devices can now be easily obtained online at a moderate cost.

The functioning of these jammers is characterized by the generation of a strong wireless signal that disrupts the physical layer of the wireless communication protocol in use. This grants them the ability to affect protocols operating at any given frequency band. Their primary influence is exerted on the medium, which constitutes the first layer of the OSI stack.As a result, any higher-level communication utilized will be affected. This includes Wifi, bluetooth, 3G, 4G, GSM, GPS, and other communication methods. It is comparable to an unpredictable individual who suddenly starts shouting during a conversation. Regardless of whether the speakers are conversing in English or Russian, they will no longer be able to communicate effectively with each other.

After the new wipe that made its way into Escape from tarkov on 28th December, players have been trying to grind in the game and have been completing quests given by traders to reap rewards, experience points, and reputation. Broadcast - Part 1 Quest is the starting point for a series of quests under trader Sergey Arsenyevich Samoylov, known by his alias "Mechanic." Once you finish this quest, you will have the opportunity to finish the other Broadcast quests and also do other ones offered by Mechanic. This particular quest happens on Lighthouse, the eighth location that was added to the game.

When you take up this quest from the Mechanic, he says that he does not really understand anything in life and that he heard something about a live broadcast in the city somewhere. He adds, “They say that someone is performing surgeries and filming it on their camera. I'd understand if it was an actually good willed doctor helping people. I would even understand if there was an organ trade, although that in itself is disgusting. But tell me, why stream this? Is this a kink for some perverted oligarchs? I honestly don't have an answer. But I do know that this broadcast must be shut down. Can you put a cell phone blocker near them?”

The Broadcast - Part 1 quest objectives are:

• Locate the hidden recording studio on Lighthouse


• Place a Signal Jammer inside the studio

For this task, you will need the Operating Room key. This can be found in the pockets and bags of Scavs as well as in jackets. However, that being said, it is a rare key. It can sometimes also be bought from the flea market.

Firstly, you will have to go to the Water Treatment Plant on Lighthouse for this quest and enter Building 1. Your PMC will start just outside Building 1 and as you enter it, you will have to hug the right-side wall and walk all the way straight till you find a door. This door leads you to the Operating Room where you will use the key.

Once you enter the room, you will immediately be prompted to plant the signal jammers anywhere in the room. It is a 10-second timer and if you happen to die while planting, you will have to start from scratch. However, the good news is, if you successfully plant the jammer, the Broadcast - Part 1 quest will get auto completed and you will not have to survive an extract from the raid.

Wi-Fi jammers: The tool of choice for criminals

The occurrence of burglars employing Wi-Fi jammers is becoming more widespread, necessitating a response from the police. In order to combat this emerging trend, arrest warrants have been acquired to enable the investigation and arrest of those implicated in these crimes.Criminals and organized gangs are taking advantage of weaknesses discovered in wireless networks, while law enforcement agencies are actively working to combat these crimes by executing arrest warrants. Through the use of signal jammers, these thieves and individuals can effectively disable security systems and surveillance cameras, making it easier for them to unlawfully enter homes without being detected by the police.

Exploit wireless network vulnerabilities

With the prevalence of wireless networks in residential environments, thieves and criminal gangs have identified a new avenue to carry out unlawful activities without legal consent. Exploiting the fact that many home security systems and cameras depend on Wi-Fi connections for communication and monitoring, these individuals take advantage of this situation.This legal loophole was skillfully exploited by the crew to circumvent the need for a search warrant. By employing Wi-Fi jammers, thieves can effectively disrupt these connections, rendering security measures useless without proper authorization.

Disable security systems and cameras

Wi-Fi interference poses a significant concern as it grants thieves the ability to interfere with the signals that security systems and cameras rely on. Once these devices are disabled, criminals can freely engage in their unlawful activities without the risk of being caught on camera or triggering alarms.

This particular approach bestows upon them a significant benefit, allowing them to enter the premises without alerting anyone or leaving any trace, even in the absence of a search warrant. Furthermore, it affords them more time to execute their actions before authorities or homeowners become aware of the intrusion, without requiring a warrant.

The mechanism of Wi-Fi interference

Jamming wireless signal

Criminals resort to Wi-Fi interference as a means to disrupt or block wireless signals, thereby preventing communication between devices connected to a Wi-Fi network. The radio frequencies emitted by these jammers can interfere with the effective operation of the Wi-Fi network, leading to its unreliability or complete inoperability.

Radio frequency interference

The functionality of jammers relies on transmitting radio signals within the same frequency range as Wi-Fi networks. This interference causes disruption in the transmission and reception of data packets, making it impossible for legitimate users to access the network. As a consequence, individuals attempting to connect to the target network will encounter severe connectivity problems or may not be able to connect at all.

For specific frequency bands

Wi-Fi networks can be affected by different types of jammers that focus on specific frequency bands. For example, certain jammers are designed to operate on the 2.4 GHz band, which is commonly used by older Wi-Fi standards like 802.11b/g/n. Conversely, there are jammers that can specifically target the 5 GHz band used by newer standards such as 802.11ac/ax.

Criminals can exploit the capabilities and vulnerabilities of devices or networks by selectively disrupting them through specific frequency bands. This targeted strategy enables them to take advantage of security system weaknesses, gaining unauthorized access to homes or businesses.

The invasion of organized crews and high-end homes

The modus operandi of organized crime syndicates has evolved to include the utilization of Wi-Fi jammers for sophisticated home invasions. These criminal groups deliberately select high-end properties fortified with advanced security systems, perceiving them as lucrative prospects to engage in illegal activities.

Thieves can effectively bypass alarm systems and surveillance cameras, which would typically block or capture them, by utilizing Wi-Fi jammers. This technology enables them to operate without detection, providing them with a notable advantage over homeowners who rely on these security measures for their defense.

These methodical operatives employ a systematic approach in selecting their targets, often engaging in extensive research and surveillance before initiating any action. Their primary aim is to identify residences with valuable assets, such as expensive jewelry or valuable artwork, to ensure that the potential rewards outweigh the risks involved. Once a target has been chosen, they meticulously strategize to ensure a successful break-in.

In certain scenarios, these offenders may adopt the guise of service personnel or delivery personnel to illicitly gain entry to a property. By blending in with genuine professionals, they can effortlessly infiltrate a heavily guarded residence without arousing any suspicion.

Homeowners need to be mindful of this growing threat and take necessary steps to ensure their own safety and protect their property. By investing in additional layers of security beyond traditional alert systems, they can effectively discourage these organized perpetrators. For instance, the installation of motion sensor lights around the house or the utilization of smart locks that require biometric authentication can provide an extra level of protection against these cunning criminals.

Remaining up to date on the latest strategies utilized by criminals and maintaining a vigilant stance is essential for homeowners to safeguard their homes. By staying one step ahead and implementing comprehensive security measures, homeowners can greatly mitigate the risk of falling victim to these organized perpetrators.

We are dedicated to supporting parents and guardians who aim to enhance online safety for children utilizing internet-enabled devices. Our service effectively filters out inappropriate digital content and enables tracking of the child's online activities.

Dad Uses Signal Jammer to Stop His Kids from Going Online

Due to his unawareness, a resident living in the southwestern French town of Messanges might face a prison term of six months for inadvertently disabling telephony and mobile internet services in his local area using a signal jammers.

Surprisingly enough, his actions were not fueled by malice. His only intention was to restrict his teenage kids from using their mobile devices to go online once it was time to sleep.

According to the French planning and radio frequency management agency (ANFR), a complaint of an unusual nature was filed by a local mobile phone operator. The complaint highlighted the inconvenience faced by the residents of Messanges, who were unable to utilize their cellular and mobile internet services from before midnight until 3 AM every week.

The French planning and radio frequency management agency (ANFR) has reported an atypical complaint lodged by a local mobile phone operator. The complaint stated that the residents of Messanges faced an inconvenience as their cellular and mobile internet services were unavailable from just before midnight until 3 AM every day of the week.

In light of their investigation, the ANFR has established that a mobile phone jammer, a device prohibited in many European countries, including France, was responsible for interfering with radio frequencies in the area.

Around 1:30 am, a technician skillfully traced the source of the signal to a residence nestled in the coastal town. The following day, investigators, accompanied by police officers, proceeded to knock on the man's door. Without any delay, the individual immediately admitted to utilizing a multi-band jammer.

The ANFR clarified that the father of the family had taken the step of installing a jammer to discourage his teenagers from using their smartphones to access the internet late at night. This decision was prompted by the children's addiction to social networks and various applications. After consulting online forums, the father concluded that a jammer would be the optimal solution to address his kids' excessive screen time.

Version 4: Besides demanding the owner to switch off the jamming wifi and refrain from using it, the ANFR agent emphasized the need to comply with the regulatory framework, as stated by the agency.

To maintain a healthy lifestyle, experts suggest that teenagers should aim for no more than two hours of screen time per day. The excessive use of phones can have detrimental effects on their physical and mental health. Additionally, excessive screen time has been linked to the development and progression of myopia, as well as conditions such as dry eye syndrome, digital eyestrain, and discomfort resulting from poor head and neck postures cell phone blocker.

The driving force behind Harvard researchers Emily Weinstein and Carrie James' investigation was the question of how teenagers spend their time on smartphones. Their findings revealed a level of complexity that often eludes adults. By surveying a diverse group of over 3,500 American teens, they gained insights into the motivations behind sexting and the strategies employed by adolescents to navigate online friendship challenges.Their research has deeply impressed me. It is remarkable to note that as adults, we often provide advice that is futile and dismiss teen phone use as a mere addiction. Hence, parents are missing out on real chances to support and guide teenagers, as emphasized in their study wifi blocker.

Again and again from teens that they don't want to feel dysregulated when it comes to their technology use, and that they actually have pretty impressive, even amazing awareness of what tech habits they have that are serving them and the tech habits that they wish they could change. We had so many quotes from teens about just this feeling of, I don't know why, but this app, TikTok is running my life, or I keep falling asleep on social media and I wish I didn't. And what we found that's actually so powerful about that recognition is that adults often get really stuck in this position of being like a referee when it comes to teens technology use, where we're just blowing the whistle when kids do something wrong or calling teens out when they misstep. We get stuck in this position.

Want to Keep Your Teens (or Employees) from Texting Behind the Wheel?

It is becoming increasingly apparent that more and more individuals are tinkering with GPS apps while behind the wheel, thereby introducing their own distracted driving risks that are dependent on the specific app and the placement of the device.

I like the texting-blocking angle myself, but I’m leery of the general data-blocking one. What about apps that use differential GPS? (Satellite plus base station data-path corrections, for greater precision.) What about streaming audio apps, like Audible or Spotify? (I use both on extended drives, and I’d hate to tell either a teen or employee she couldn’t, just to block texting). What if the driver wants to hand her smartphone off to someone else in the car to use for some data-related function, say looking up a restaurant or fiddling with the GPS or just checking email or text messages on behalf of the driver? (My wife did this for me for over a year whenever I drove, until she got her own smartphone.)